[diamond-optic]

far cry 3 doesnt seem to be much of an improvement over far cry 2 (tho as much potential that fc2 had it ended up being pretty bad after the first hour or two.. this so far is at least a little better) ...but it seems to be quite a bit like just cause 2, but maybe worse graphics.. and if not worse, theyre definitely not 2.5yrs worth of improvement when compared to jc2... Im not far into FC3 yet so i cant exactly say, but jc2 seemed to be a bigger world and flying was a major thing.. idk if fc3 is as large or has flying (other then the hang glider ive found so far) but i kind of want to go back to playing jc2 again now instead lol

i still feel like crysis captured the jungle better then fc3.. and crysis was what, 2009? games in 2012 should be crysis level or better.. i just dont get it.. theres almost like visual 'glitches' that arent glitches per-say, but more like they didnt bother to make it more realistic... the plants & grass just look and act like shit.. barely anything in the world reacts to bullets, explosions, etc.. and most of the things that do dont seem to use any sort of physics, just makes the world seem artificial


then again im sure consoles are a major factor that held fc3 back in terms of pc... and a console port is always obvious when the first thing you see when starting the game is 'this game saves automatically, do not turn your system off when the save icon is on screen' ...cause you know, ppl just hit the power button on their pcs in the middle of games when theyre done like console fags do lol...

maybe if the next gen consoles would freakin come out, pc games wouldnt be held back by super outdated console tech... (even tho current pcs are more powerful then the next gen consoles already lol)


*******


and i havent even logged onto wow in like a month.. proud of myself lol. Shit just got super boring, and ever since becoming a GM on the server i played on it was just annoying as hell to even log on.. Wonder if they took my GM away for not playing anymore.